|
| page :: 1 : 2 : 3 |
|
KELLER ON PREACHING IN A POST-MODERN CITY II (continued
from page 2) The gospel is that Jesus lived the life you should have lived and died the death you should have died, in your place, so God can receive you not for your record and sake but for his record and sake. b. The gospel is grace to the weak rather than
power to the strong. ("THE GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM" Matt. 4:23) We also see that the gospel is not simply that Christ has come into history to save us, but also it is how he accomplishes that. The answer is: through a new, deep structure or 'paradigm' that completely contradicts the way of the world. God's saving purposes are effected through the crucified and risen Christ. Christ wins through losing, triumphs through defeat, achieves power through weakness and service, comes to wealth via giving all away. And those who receive his salvation are not the strong and accomplished but those who admit they are weak and lost. In short, Jesus pulls off 'the great reversal'. "The essence of sin is man substituting himself for God, while the essence of salvation is God substituting himself for man. Man... puts himself where only God deserves to be; God... puts himself were only man deserves to be." [John Stott, The Cross of Christ (Inter-Varsity Press, 1986), p.160]
This pattern so contradicts the thinking and practice of the world, that it creates an 'alternate kingdom', an 'alternate city' (Matt. 5:14-16) in which there is a complete reversal of the values of the world with regard to power, recognition, status, wealth. The gospel reverses the place of the weak and the strong, the "outsider" and the "insider." It is an advantage, spiritually speaking, to see one's weakness; it is a severe danger, spiritually speaking, to be successful and accomplished. And when we finally understand that we can be saved by sheer grace through Christ, we stop seeking salvation (either that of psychological fulfillment, or of social transformation, or of spiritual blessing, or of all three) in power, status and accomplishment. That destroys their power in our lives. The reversal of the cross, the grace of God, thus liberates us from bondage to other power of material things and worldly status in our lives. We begin to live a new life without much regard to them. Many Christians 'reduce' the gospel to the good news of individual forgiveness of sins. But clearly, the gospel writers are talking about something much more than that. The "gospel of the kingdom" is a phrase used numerous times in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. The 'Great Reversal' of the cross means that the gospel proclaims and creates a reversal of the values of the world. For example, the gospel is especially welcomed by the poor and for the poor (Luke 4:18- He has anointed me... to preach the gospel to the poor." Cf. also Luke 7:22.) Preaching the gospel and healing people's bodies are closely associated (Luke 9:6). The gospel creates a people with a whole alternate way of being human. Racial and class superiority, accrual of money and power at the expense of others, yearning for popularity and recognition – all these things are marks of living in the world, and are the opposite of the mindset of the kingdom (Luke 6:20-26). What is the 'kingdom of God?
What is the relationship of the gospel to the kingdom?
Summary: Second, we see that the gospel of free grace is necessarily a 'gospel of the kingdom' which effects the way we live in society and in the world. The gospel is not just (as is often thought) the message of how you can get individual forgiveness and eternal life through Jesus. But we cannot separate this second 'perspective' from the first. If we are not saved wholly by Christ (not ourselves) then the kingdom of God is not good news! It is not good news to be told, simply: "God has created a mini-society of freedom and justice based on his laws. Join up!" That would make the message of Christianity a burdensome one of instruction on how to live (Perspective #1) not a message of grace. But also, separated from the other perspectives, the kingdom of God would simply never 'work'. What makes people able to change their mindset from 'worldly' to 'kingdom' is the existential experience of justification and sonship (Perspective #3), not just being told to live unselfishly. The gospel is: the way up is down, the way to power is give up power and serve, the way in to God is to go to the margins in repentance and faith. The gospel is God loves to work through the weak, the marginal, the poor. c. The gospel is of faith rather than of merit
or performance. ("THE GOSPEL OF YOUR SALVATION" Eph. 1:13) While the gospels (especially the 'Synoptics' – Matthew, Mark, and Luke) stress the gospel of the kingdom, the epistles, and especially those of Paul, show how it is additionally "the gospel of your salvation" (Eph. 1:13). Paul, better than any other Biblical writer, explores the meaning of the 'gospel of Christ' for the individual believer. He tells us that the gospel "reveals a righteousness from God" (Rom. 1:17). Here and in Galatians 2 Paul specifically identifies the gospel with the teaching that we receive not just pardon and forgiveness but also the righteousness of Christ (2 Cor. 5:21). This is received by faith in the finished work of Christ, not by good works or our merit. If we think of the gospel as only pardon or forgiveness of sins, we will trust in God for our past salvation, but will trust in our own present strivings and attainments for our present relationship with God. But the "hope of the gospel" (Col. 1:23) is that " now he has reconciled you by Christ's body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation." (Col. 1:22) The gospel offers not just forgiveness for our bad record, but also complete acceptance through Christ's perfect record. Christ did not only die in our place but lived a perfect life in our place. Therefore we do not simply get forgiveness for sins from Christ, but also complete acceptance. His perfect past and record now (in God's sight) becomes ours. Thus the entire Christian life is a life "lived (in a continual present progressive) by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me." (Gal. 2:20) On the one hand, this certainly means we can only enter a relationship with God by the deliberate act of trusting in his work and rejecting any trust in our own. (Rom. 4:5 – Now to the one who does not work, but trusts God who justifies the wicked, his faith is credited to him as righteousness.) But, on the other hand, (as the present progressive of Gal. 2:20 indicates) we must continually remind ourselves of our status as legally righteous, adopted children of God. Galatians is written to Christians who are losing their grip on the doctrine of free justification and may be 'returning to the bondage' (Gal. 5:1) to false savior-gods (Gal. 4:8). Whenever we lose our grip on the gospel of salvation-by-faith-not-works, and we fall back into some form of works-righteousness, we return to fear and bondage. Through the gospel we can say: "I am accepted through Christ, therefore I obey." But the human heart operates on the 'religious' principle: "I obey, therefore I am accepted". The gospel, then, differs from both religion and irreligion. You can, of course, seek to be your own 'lord and savior' by breaking the law of God. But you can also do so by keeping the law to earn your salvation. Disbelief in the gospel of grace is therefore not only the main thing that keeps the unconverted from God. It also is the main cause of spiritual deadness, fear, and pride in Christians, because our hearts continue to act on the basis "I obey, therefore I am accepted." They look to things to 'save' us (such as our family, our moral record, our work, and so on.) They become more central to our hope and identity than God, which returns us to fear and bondage. So we do not 'get saved' by believing the gospel and then 'grow' by trying hard to live according to Biblical principles.The gospel is the way not only to meet God, but to grow into him. Only by deepening and renewing our understanding of the gospel do we overcome our character flaws. Only profound knowledge of our acceptance in Christ makes the law of God a thing of beauty instead of a burden. Then we can use it to delight, resemble, and know the one who saved us – rather than to get his attention or procure his favor. Then we can run the race "for the joy set before us" rather than "for the fear coming behind us". The gospel is that you are more wicked and flawed then you ever dared believe, and more loved and accepted than you ever dared hope at the same time. Unconditionally loved and radically humbled. Simul justus et peccator. 2. The Importance of All the Perspectives These three perspectives are important to "keep together". There are today different 'parties' that have isolated and focused on one aspect of the gospel – this usually leads to difficulties and imbalances. The 'classic evangelical' position is 'the gospel of Christ' – which all by itself leads to a ministry almost strictly of apologetics, evangelism, and discipleship. The implications for worship: a very sermon/teaching oriented service. This is the position of the evangelical world of the last 50 years. If you 'came up' in InterVarsity or Campus Crusade, or in one of the older confessional churches or independent Bible churches – that is what you heard. The 'progressive evangelical' position is the 'gospel of the kingdom' – which all by itself leads to a ministry mainly of community-building and social justice. The implications for worship: often more liturgical. This position is gaining a lot of steam, and is uniting former liberals, who are recognizing the bankruptcy of former ways, and former classical evangelicals, who are recognizing the individualism of their former ways. This group is strong at seeing the church as a 'counter-culture' modeling the kingdom, and strong on calls to engage with modern culture. The problem is – they often reject the very idea of legal, forensic justification (as too individualistic). I wonder if that might not lead to a 'communal' legalism in the end. Will calls to join the 'reign of God' lead anyone to sing 'my chains fell off, my heart was free, I rose, went forth, and followed thee?' The 'revivalist evangelical' position is the 'gospel of sonship'. Among charismatics and others in the revival tradition (since Jonathan Edwards) – there is this basic idea. Most of the time, the Christian church is moribund and lacks the power of the Spirit. In times of revival, however, the nominalism, legalism, and works-righteousness of the church falls away and there is a recapture of the gospel of free justification and sonship. Then Christians are renewed, as they recapture their identity as children of God, and non-Christians are attracted in. This position – all by itself, leads to a ministry emphasizing prayer, personal renewal, and lots of personal counseling. The implications for worship: often more on the charismatic, contemporary, informal style. This view has historically been in tension with both the classic view (which sees it as too oriented to 'feelings') and the kingdom view (which sees it as too individualistic). But not only should these perspectives be 'combined' – it must be seen that they interpenetrate and contain one another. Put another way: if you push down deep enough into any of the perspectives, you find the other two! For example: if you push down into the gospel of sonship far enough, you will discover that we need to care for the poor. My new identity in Christ, when perfected, must remove class pride and racism. For example: if you push down into the gospel of the kingdom far enough, you will see that the cross does not only liberate from the power of social idols, but personal idols, which are always rooted in self-righteousness.
|
|||||||||||||||
| page :: 1 : 2 : 3 |